Regulation
CLOUD Act explained: why 'servers in the EU' is not enough
The American law that means 'EU data storage' does not always mean what you think. Five minutes of reading that explains the basis for all our origin marking.
When we mark tools as Swedish, European, or global, this is the law behind it. CLOUD Act is the most important piece of the puzzle for understanding where your data actually is.
What the law says
CLOUD Act stands for Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act and came in 2018. The law gives US authorities the right to demand data from American companies. It requires a US court order. It does not matter where in the world the data is stored. What matters is the company, not the server.
This means in practice: an American cloud provider with a data center in Stockholm can still be forced to hand over data from there. “We store in the EU” thus protects less than it sounds. It gives better speed and simpler GDPR work. But it does not make the data inaccessible to US law.
Who is affected?
- American companies and their subsidiaries. It also applies to EU-registered subsidiaries of American groups.
- In practice, it also applies to services where an American parent company controls the data. It is enough that the company owns, holds, or controls the information.
That is why we assess tools based on where the group is based, not just where the server stands. A tool marketed as Swedish but owned by an American company therefore gets the global marking from us.
What it does NOT mean
The counterpoint: CLOUD Act is not an open door where US authorities read everyone’s email. It requires a court order in a criminal investigation. For most small businesses’ ordinary data, the risk is low in practice. The question matters most for sensitive personal data, trade secrets, and the public sector. There, even a theoretical possibility of access can be unacceptable.
How to reason practically
- Non-sensitive data (marketing texts, public material): choose any supplier. CLOUD Act rarely matters.
- Customer data and personal data: consider where the supplier is based. European alternatives such as Mistral or Nextcloud remove the question entirely.
- Sensitive or classified data (healthcare, legal, public sector): choose a Swedish or European supplier with operations in the EU, for example Berget. Also read our procurement checklist.
The status of each individual tool can be filtered in our CLOUD Act status for all reviewed tools, or filter directly by origin in the explore view.
Sources
Tools mentioned
Mistral (Le Chat)
Mistral AI
France's answer to ChatGPT: the AI chat Le Chat from Mistral AI in Paris, one of the few European models in the top class. Data is stored within the EU, with a GDPR data processing addendum and certifications for SOC 2 Type II as well as ISO 27001 and 27701. A free tier is available to start with.
- European model in the top class, developed by Mistral AI in Paris.
- Data storage within the EU, with a GDPR processing addendum and certifications for SOC 2 Type II as well as ISO 27001/27701.
- Does not quite reach the level of the largest American models.
Best for: A Swedish consultant or agency that wants a powerful AI chat for quotes and emails without handing data to an American provider.
Berget AI
Berget AI
Swedish AI platform that runs language models on servers in Sweden, for those who must have full control over where data ends up.
- AI models on Swedish servers
- Full data control, no CLOUD Act risk
- More technical, aimed at developers
Best for: Companies and public sector that require AI in Swedish or on EU servers.
Nextcloud
Nextcloud
German platform for files, collaboration, chat and calendar, Europe's great alternative to Google Workspace and Microsoft 365.
- Brings files, chat, calendar and documents together in one platform
- German, can run on own EU servers
- Someone has to run and maintain your own server
Best for: Companies that want control over files and collaboration within the EU.
Related articles
This is general information, not legal advice. See How we review.